Nuking Tehran - How do you say Ground Zero in Persian?

Crossposted from Left Toon Lane, Bilerico Project & My Left Wing


click to enlarge

When I was in high school, I was well educated in Soviet geography. Vladivostok, Novosibirsk and of course Moscow were all familiar places on the world map. Sadly, Americans seem to get the bulk of the geographic education when we go to war (fake or otherwise). Mosul? That is in Northern Iraq and Highway 2 goes right through it. Basra? Oh that is the seaport on the Gulf. Minnesota? What the Hell are you talking about?

Despite our highest hopes of electing a Democratic Congress, they seem to have no intent of removing a war criminal from power. Nor does it appear they will make any serious moves to prevent nuclear war with Iran... yet ANOTHER nation that has done nothing us. (OK, the hostages were an issue 3 decades ago, but we did open diplomatic channels with them again - oh, my bad, that was back when we practiced DIPLOMACY. Back to our nightmare at hand.)

BushCo has reneged on every nuclear arms control treaty this nation has ever signed plus he has not lifted a finger to negotiate new ones. On top of that he started building NEW nukes. The idiot never met a law he didn't want to break.

Now we have this recent history of invading countries that hasn't attacked us (and avoiding those who have - ahem... Saudi Arabia) is it any wonder the United States is seen as the biggest threat to peace and stability on the planet?

If we drop ANY kind of nuclear device on Iran, it will open up a Pandora's Box of sorrow that we have managed to keep shut for more than 60 years. Even if it is a bunker buster, America will then become the world's NUMBER ONE rogue nation without a doubt.

When the only global friend you have is Communist China, it speaks volumes of how far we will have fallen.

I believe that ANY attack on

I believe that ANY attack on Iran will be a Pandora's box of horror, and that any attack on Iran will inevitably involve nukes sooner or later.

When will the Dems wake up to this?

I'm as against a preemptive

I'm as against a preemptive strike against Iran as any of us are, and not to be disrespectful, but I have to disagree, Iran has attacked us before, and the year was 1983:

The Build-up to War with Iran and Syria

I have written this particular piece because I have noticed that CNN and other stations are making note of the Marine Barracks and Embassy bombings in Lebanon back in 1983'. I have also noted they haven't told the whole story - one that revealed we had the "smoking gun" on Iran and Syria for those bombings, and the CIA Agent who found the evidence, the smoking-gun, lost his position and the US withdrew from Lebanon. It seems that our own internal propaganda machine is at work to inform the American people that Iran is indeed the culprit - thus attempting to justify military action. Yes, they were involved, but wiping Iran off of the map for crimes that should have been addressed in 1983 makes little or no sense to me.

When the U.S. Embassy in Beirut was decimated by a car bomb in 1983, it was not just a symbolic strike against America. Someone deliberately targeted those they believed were calling the shots in this volatile region--the CIA. Nearly the entire Middle East CIA Station was wiped out. The agency called on "Captain Crunch" Keith Hall, a former Marine who was one of the CIA's best men in the field. Keith arrived in Beirut with the full resources of a battered agency behind him--and a difficult mission in front. LINK

Note: The link above is for the DVD from the History Channel that has documented this event quite well. I have never understood why we withdrew without retaliating for the brutal murders of our soldiers - and why America has never been told the entire truth! Instead, we withdrew, and now face a much more powerful and resolute Iran. Go figure!

I've written a lot in regard Iran and what I believe is an inevitable Israeli sponsored or bi-lateral attack on Iran, especially in the past two articles:

Iran - a prelude to War

The Eve of Des
truction - Iran & Bush, Part III
MORE

We literally had the "smoking Gun of Syrian and Iranian involvement, yet I believe it was Ronald Reagan who was in office back then, and rather than retaliating against an unprovoked attack that murdered over 240 United States citizens, mostly Marines, the United States chose to "cut and run" rather than facing the issue when we stood upon the moral high-ground to do so.

Ask yourselves if we would have responded appropriately back then, immediately after we were in possession of the hard evidence, would we still face this situation as we do in Iran? I don't think so, but instead politics got in the way - and Iran and Syria were able to get-away with wholesale murder of American Military and other civilians, US citizens, which I believe served to embolden them to further their agenda in supporting terrorist organizations, financially, with supplies, and even by "boots on the ground" as was the case in the recent war in Lebanon.

I've studied Iran for years, and written several pieces that demonstrate in many ways they are a threat - but when you look at an administration that hasn't done anything without thousands of people dying, the thought of attempting to solve the issues which could easily escalate into WWIII by the Bush administration is akin to hanging-off a cliff, and knowing the rope will break at any moment! You know it's a matter of time before the rope breaks.

The Russians' have a nick-name for George W. Bush; it's "The Master of Disaster"!

If he attacks Iran, the probability of it escalating is guaranteed, we'll find ourselves under martial law and likely suffer several major terrorist attacks that far out-shadow 911, as they will be accomplished by and through the corporate elites who have lobbied and stalled anything meaningful in regard securing our southern border, and we already have evidence that Iranian QUDs Force and Hezbollah elements who have already penetrated our security and now dwell in our own country, courtesy of an administration that can't even walk and chew bubble-gum. :( Jeez, put him in a loony bin while most of us are still alive!

JAC

See, the thing is, if we are

See, the thing is, if we are going to start talking about undercover operations and proxy wars that's a whole 'nother can of worms isn't it?, and it provides still less justification for war.